__
Note: We don’t censor posts. We, however, delete spams and redundant posts. If your post had been censored, you wouldn’t be seeing your trash language in our pages. (Admin - 07/17/08)

I had enough bullshit from this “revolutionary” blog. You don’t even have analysis on gender oppression! this isn’t a blog for revolutionary change in the world, its all about dellusions and idealism, as if the proletarians where everywhere in the world including paradise tourist heavens! You always spout of liberating the oppressed and you attack those who are doind it in real life.

You are nothing but petite bourgeois “fanatics” who see the world as there was only the bourgeoise and the proletariat. That problems are of the same type in different countries. Your thoughts are completely irrational. No wonder almost everyone dedicated to real change hate people like you and find this site full of bitterness and shit.

WE DONT BUT IT!

Any analysis of the revolution and the construction of China society will show that the economic relation of the working class and the collectivised farmer remained that of an exploited class by a military-politico elite - ie. the CPC that itself became the state. In all facets of nationalised industry party apparatchiks planned and directed production, in the defence of the national revolution the party directed and controlled the armed bodies of men, in society political thought directed by the party was the guidance for all life and no exceptions were allowed. But fundamentally the relation of the working class and farmer was as an exploited class of the state, a state led by the CPC.

The relationship of the class to the means of production is the key to any analysis of the nature of a regime. That the state extracted a surplus and that the law of value remained in force meant that China after the revolution was still a capitalist country albeit under state control.

It wasnt as the trotskyists such as Chen Du-xiu analysed, a deformed workers state! After all the working class never achieved power - it was a militarist conquest by the CPC/PLA. The working class played no indipendent role in the conquest of power. They were merely the cannon fodder for the Stalinists of the CPC to take power of the state and economy. In fact as a precondition of the ability for Maoism as with all Stalinism to take power it was essential that the working class was destroyed as an indipendently combative force. That was achieved in the popular front directive of the Comintern and the defeat of the 1927 revolution and further cemented by the turn of the CPC/PLA against the working class in favor of what was to become the bourgeois revolution of China in 1949.

That the CPP glorifies the military victory of the Chinese bourgeois revolution should be enough for any comrade to recognise that all the CPP merely wants is what they perceive as the necessary stage of the development of Philippine society, its own bourgeois revolution - hence the analysis of society being semi-feudal! This in itself of course being nonsense. The CPP as with the stalinists of the Rejectionists merely envisage a stage of development of national democratic struggle. ie. national bourgeois revolution.
Communists stand for the international proletarian revolution and all the distortions in the world will never divorce that fact from the minds of the conscious proletarian revolutionaries of all countries.

Salute to all proletarians internationally we are of one country - manggagawa country!

On a note on debate - it would be helpful to serious revolutionaries if the nonsense and insults were put more politically.

paumanhin pero ang tono at lenggwaheng ginagamit mo dito sa diskusyon ay hindi aktitud ng isang tunay na marxista. kung alam mo ang diwa ng pakikipagdebate nila Lenin at maging si Mao mismo, makikita mo na salungat ka sa kanila. gaya ng sabi namin, patunayan mo na ang maoismo ay pagpapatuloy ng marxismo sa mahigit 200 taong pakikibaka ng uring manggagawa sa buong mundo. hindi pwedeng idaan mo lang sa sloganeering ang pagtatanggol sa maoismo.

ang aktitud mo ay patunay lamang na isang burges na ideolohiya ang maoismo at ang lahat ng hibo nito….

BANGKAROTA NA ANG BURGES NA IDEOLOHIYANG MAOISMO SA MUNDO. hindi lang ito napatunayan sa teorya kundi maging sa praktika. pinakahuling patunay dito ay ang Nepal. sumunod lamang ang mga maoista sa Nepal sa pagiging bangkarota ng mga burges na ideolohiya na nasa loob ng kilusang paggawa gaya ng Trotskyismo at Anarkismo.

for sure you are not Jose Ma. Sison who used that nom de guerre. anyway, by using that “name” you only expose yourself a fanatic of one man.

it is not surprising that a maoist like you, same as the trotskyists really hate INTERNATIONALISM, one of the basic principle of marxism. it is proven not only in theory but also in practice that maoism is a bourgeois ideology. you maoists are like racist and fundamentalist fanatics. ang laman ng iyong komento ay walang anumang hibo ng marxismo kundi katulad ng tono at laman ng mga panatikong pundamentalista.

dapat sana ay “durugin” ninyo batay sa marxismo na mali ang pahayag namin dito ayon sa teorya at praktika ng marxismo sa mahigit 200 taon. pero kung magkasya na lang kayo sa simpleng pagtindig na ang maoismo ay “acme” ng marxismo para na ring pinukpok ninyo ang inyong mga ulo sa pader.

noon MLM lang. ngayon naman ay maoism-thirworldism. alam kong split kayo sa MIM at kaaway ninyo ang RIM….

noon pinupuri ninyo ang CPN (Maoist) sa Nepal dahil sa kanilang PPW sa 1996, ngayon naman kinundena ninyo sila na rebisyunista. pero bakit tahimik kayo sa pambubusabos ng CPP at ng kanilang mga legal na organisasyon sa maoism-thirdworldism ninyo? hihintayin pa ba ninyong gagawin ni Joma Sison ang ginawa ng mga maoista sa Nepal bago ninyo sabihing “rebisyunista” si Joma sa maoismo?

dahil isang burges na ideolohiya ang maoismo, nasasalamin sa loob nito ang inter-factional conflicts of the ruling class. tingnan nyo na lang sa Pilipinas, nagpapatayan ang dalawang maoistang armadong grupo — MLPP/RHB at CPP-NPA.

bakit wala akong nabasang komento ninyo sa MLPP/RHB? maoist din ba ang grupong ito ayon sa inyong maoism-thirdworldism.

panghuli, puring-puri ninyo ang CPP-NPA sa ngayon, pero suportado ba ng CC ang ideolohiyang maoism-thridworldism? bakit wala akong nabasa sa Ang Bayan o kahit sa Rebolusyon man lang?