Idiots from your sect uphold current China still as “maoist”. we are not getting theough anywhere with this pro-imperilaist bullshit as espoused by the pseudo-Marxists. not to mention how impossible a communist revlution is with the people of your type to lead the way, you are not even scientific to add. I suggest you review Das Kapital since you have aleady forgot it.

I firmly stand in my later statement that this site is still full of shit. Plus, don’t you know how “left” “communism” was a corpse ideology along with “trotskyism” and other things that certain number of individualist couch potatoes who see themselves as “better” “revolutionaries” can feed the proletariat with, unfortunately, the wretehced of the earth don’t buy it. Your cause has little or almost nothing to call as mass support here in the Philippines.

And here it is, instead of uniting with the revolutionary movement, you attack us with your vague shit criticisms, and call us fighting for “national capitalist revolution”. Revolution isn’t a ballet dance, waging revolution is a reality for us, and still bitches from ICC attack us with theri “better” “analysis”. All of you haven’t even shed a drop of sweat nor blood for the proletarian rev.So fuck off.

People like you of the “rejectionist” type had nothing else to do but to create confusion and deviation in the Philippine condition, just like the “marxist-leninists” of the RPA(who call us “stalinists” or “maoists” just like all the rest of you here), the rj trotskyists, and other petite bullshit organizations that acts as agents of counter-revolution and imperialism.

Our differnces are polar, we have been considering you as enemies since Lenin was alive. So god damn the sectarian “left” “communists” who are nothing but petite bourgeois pigs to the core.

I also agree that the sectarian slanders against the Left Communist cadre is against the Marxist tradition of debate. In typical maoist style it is you are not with us u are against us. Arrogant nonsense typical of a sectarian group with no tradition in the proletarian struggle.

The first test of communism in practice is of course Russia 1917, the Left Communists being part of the Bolsheviks and internatuionally on the side of that and their own revolutions, Germany, Italy etc. The significance of LC is in the critique of the failure of that revolution and its movement to the counter-revolution.

Let us look at where maoism was actually practiced and that is of course China. What can we say about China.

1. Not a socialist state but a national capitalist revolution. It overthrew feudalism but moved almost immediately to state capitalism. All industry and agriculture under the direct control of the state. The state being in control of the party. The relationship of the proletariat and peasantry was economically as provision of surplus value to the state.

2. In order to achieve power the CPC necessarily usurped control of the revolution from the proletariat and in the name of the people - in the service of the people. All independent working class organisations and action was and is ruthlessly repressed. In order to achieve power the working class as an indipendet force has to be destroyed - see also Vitenam, Laos, Kampuchea etc…

3. The natural conclusion of the development was as we see today - state capitalism in the service of the party and the apparatchiks with a small indipendent bourgeois. Mao would have approved of the ZTE deal no doubt.

4. Mao dropped all pretence to being a socialist after the 1927 revolution. From there on it was national liberation and capitalism. I suggest that comrade Maoist read Mao.

As to the arguments on Philippines. the nature of the comrade’s argument is that we are semi feudal that capitalism is not strong enough to develop because of the influence of US imperialism that makes Philippines a chattel state. Even though th4e CPP recognises that the generalised mode of production is capitalism but because of the lack of mechanisation we must be still considered as a feudal nation!

Please add Korea, China, Japan and Philippines and Malaysia to the list of imperialisms. Remember Bangsamoro. You forget here the argument of all Marxists from Lenin (please excuse Trotsky from the list) on the question of the decadence of capitalism that all nations are either greater or lesser imperialists given the exhaustion of pre-capitalist markets. Neo-colonialism in that sense is a liberal analysis to divert attention form the internationalism of the working class in favor of national liberation struggles for their own national ‘progressive’ bourgeois. It is a nonsense argument. It espouses that there can and needs to be a capitalist national revolution as opposed to socialism which is of course international. It is actually a liberal argument co-opted by stalinists to justify their nationalism.

In all this the comrade as with Mao rejects the Russian revolution and the lessons thereof. Remember comrade we were dealing with a nation where the proletariat was a tiny fraction of the populace and the nature of the country was as a chattel state of european capitalism and was itself an imperialist state. Please refer to Lenin on the rights of nations to self determination for this. This did not stop the prolertariat from gaining power and moving - albeit under the distress of Totsky and Lenin in the leadership and their errors - to spread the revolution internationaly.

The comrade obviously denies the law of combined and uneven development in favor of capitalist formal logic in that what is necessary for Philippines in a bourgeois national revolution before at some stage when capitalism is developed (200 years i believe Joma once stated) we can move to socialism.

All our dear Comrade states is that he is in favor of a national capitalist revolution. All our comrade supports is a faction of the ‘national’ bourgeois in coming to power. As if it isn’t already in control - or one section is.

Actually there is nothing to point out here. Your “left” wing “communist” “Marxist” thoughts still remained as thoughts, and has never been tested through the revolutionary scientific application. Do you think you can achieve communism by sitting your fat lard asses in front of computers? Why don’t you organize and go in an all out armed insurrection?

Attacking the Maoists only make you look like imperialist puppets since they are the sole forces that hurt imperialism other than militant Islam. Instead of uniting with the revolutionary forces you go into your all round bullshit criticism while pondering into your untested abstract ideology.