pero anung ginagawa nyo!.. lalo lang kayong nagpapabigat sa pasanin ng uring manggagawa. nais ko lang ipaalala sa inyo na ang ultimate arbiter is the practice..
so, ipakita nyo muna sa praktika na tama kayo bago nyo ipagmayabang.. wag pa as if malakas pa kayo dahil sa totoo lang aminin nyo man o hindi humihina na kayo.
mga UNGAS!….

isa pa, ang tunay na proletaryado hindi nakikipag collaborate kay Manny Villar or sinumang naghaharing uri.

saka pahabol pa. magaling kayong mag interpret ng data nyo, very dialectic and materialistic.pero ang di ko maintindihan, bat nakalutang sa hangin?..

At bakit naman hindi ako magreklamo na bina-block nyo ang posts ko noong afternoon of July 18? Totoo naman talagang bina—block ninyo that day! Ang posts na yun ay galing sa aking discussion notes which I found relevant as reply to your irresponsible, infantile, undialectical charge that Maoism is a petty-bourgeois ideology. Because it was quite long, I tried to deliver it in parts. The first two deliveries were successful but the third did not appear even after some minutes of waiting. So I tried again. After two tries when it still did not appear, I reckoned that it was rejected because of its length. So I sub-partitioned the third installment into several parts. Some appeared but others did not. Every time the delivery would not appear, I would repeat clicking the “say it’ button. That explains the “repetitiveness”. But on the eighth installment, wala na talaga until I gave up after almost two hours of waiting.

To make it short, I know enough about blogs and websites to tell you that your explanation about the incident – that you don’t have a full time administrator – does not wash. You tell that to the Marines. The belated appearance of my subsequent installments is to me but an afterthought to the charge that you are blocking them.

Gustong palabasin ng mga gunggong na bago pa lang sila kaya daw wala silang full time administrator. Sa totoo lang, ang kanilang ideolohiya ay mas tamang tatawagin na eklektisimo, hindi Marxismo. Ang kanilang kaisipan, kung may kaisipan mang meron in between their ears, ay halo-halong kalamay sa lahat ng tendensiya mula sa old PKP through Trotskyism, council communism, syndicalism, hanggang sa extreme lunatic fringe of left-wing communism. Matagal na ang tendensyang ito sa Pilipinas at nanatili itong tendensya dahil napako ito sa paralysis of its inability to create a movement here in the country. Kaya, as their theory can not even move a chair, hanggang ngayon hindi makapagpalitaw ng full timer.

Nagtatrabaho daw sila kaya wala silang full timer. Ibig sabihin, nag-eekonomiya sila hindi nagrerebolusyon. They are Economists, not revolutionaries. Hindi nila ipinapraktika ang kanilang teorya. Kaya, maliban sa transcendental reason na ang kanilang teorya ay hindi nakabatay sa existing material conditions (existing stage of development of the country), hindi nangyayari ang kanilang “internationalist communist revolution”dito sa bansa dahil hindi nila ipinapraktika ang kanilang teorya. Marxista ba ang mga ganitong “soap box orators” sa Internet?

Bakit hindi nila maipraktika ang kanilang teorya? Its either of the following:

1.They have tried but they failed because the theory does not tally with reality.
2.They have tried but no one believed them.
3.They themselves do not have confidence in their theory but maintained holding it anyway since it gives them self-gratification as prophets of a revolution that is bound not to come because of no. 1. Ergo, they are the petty-bourgeois incarnation of what Marx calls the “poverty of philosophy”, the petty-bourgeois who loves to prattle but has no desire to act.

Halata namang indibidwalismo at hindi Marxismo ang inyong pinangangalandakan sa masa. Sabihin ninyo kung anong organisasyon kayo para malaman naman namin kung ano ba talaga kayo. BMP? PM? Sinisira ninyo ang proletaryong kilusan, at wala kayong naitulong man upang mapalago ito. Mga inutil.